?>
Adventures of Catkin and Codlin, Christopher Cricket an
| £3.47 End Date: Thursday Sep-09-2010 6:02:58 BST Buy It Now for only: £3.47 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| £16.95 End Date: Thursday Sep-09-2010 6:04:01 BST Buy It Now for only: £16.95 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| £2.25 End Date: Thursday Sep-09-2010 6:35:33 BST Buy It Now for only: £2.25 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
| £0.75 (0 Bid) End Date: Thursday Sep-09-2010 6:45:01 BST Bid now | Add to watch list |
![]() BUY HERE! |
Much of it reminds me of the current fashion for television documentaries which tell us how unreasonable our leaders were in that war or that crisis and how they ought not to have behaved the way they did. Yes, perhaps it's a pity the game wasn't run on a democratic basis but that's the way society was at the time and I'm not convinced that everything is so much better now it's in the hands of the professionals.
The amateurs weren't all bad, as Birley implies. Some of them did make more money from expenses than the professionals did from wages and some failed to uphold the standards expected of "gentlemen". But others played just for the fun of it, without financial reward, and were worth their place in the side. Some of the businessmen and gentry enabled counties to avoid bankruptcy; many current observers (including some who owe their current jobs to county cricket) would say, "Pity!" but, to many people, county cricket has given more pleasure than international cricket.
Birley is so biassed about amateurs that he fails to acknowledge that even a professional might have three initials: what about CWL Parker, HTW Hardinge, HAW Bowell, WRD Payton or even JEBBPQC Dwyer, from the period before the First World War?
In fact, he rarely has a good word for anybody. He describes George Emmett, who replaced Len Hutton in one of the 1948 Tests, as "very ordinary" in one book and "wholly inadequate" in the other. This is not the impression one gains from other writers such as David Foot (who wrote the glowing foreword) or Stephen Chalke and, in an interview shown on television recently, Tom Graveney evidently thought he was better than that. Birley is so dismissive of county cricket that I don't believe he can have seen much of it.